Where did this Greek Text come from?

In order to understand where this new Greek Text came from, there needs to be a understanding of how the Bible became the Bible as we know it today.

1.  The original scriptures were letters (epistles) written to the Churches "by the inspiration of
     God." (2Tim.3:16) These "inspired" letters (epistles) were hand copied and distributed
     amongst the Churches, because there was no printing press invented yet. (It was not invented
     until 1450 AD.6 )  It was in the hands of the people, not the Scholar, Intellectual, Seminary
     or College Professor. This was according to the pattern that God gave the Levitical priesthood,
     the "shadow of good things to come." (Heb.10:1) The "priests the sons of Levi" were charged
     with protecting, guarding, teaching, supervising the copying of God's Word. (Deut.17:18; 24:18;
     31:9-11, 2Chron.15:3; 34:15, Neh.8:2, Mal.2:7, 1Peter.2:5-9, Rev.1:6; 5:10)  This
     responsibility continued in the hands of the people of the1st.century Church as "a royal
     priesthood." The same is true today!

2. The apostle John put the first canon of scripture together. (Canon meaning, what
     belongs in the Bible and what does not) This was done again in 367 AD. and 382 AD. with the
     same results.7

3.  After the death of John (approx.100 AD.) a spiritual decline began to happen in the
     Church and they began to "turn aside" from God's Word. (Review Phase 2 for decline  of the Church)  

4.  Within a 100 years corrupt manuscripts began to "leaven" the Church. 12  The Church
     was reaping this "notorious" corruption because they "turned aside" from truth of God's
     Word. (Review Phase 2 for the History of the Church turning aside) Agreement between copies
     was hopeless, and each one was claiming to be correcting the manuscripts. Sounds like today! 

5.  This gave prominence (fame, notoriety) to the "Ebonite" and Gnostic" heresies (The
     denial of Christ's Deity and His bodily resurrection) which came from Origen and Clement.
     (202-325 AD.)  Who was Origen?
     a.  Origen was the "most important theologian and biblical scholar of  the early Greek church." 
     b.  Origen and Clement, were "two of the most  prominent fathers...chief representatives of
          the School of Alexandria, the great melting pot of Greek philosophy and Judaism."
     c.  Because of his reputation, Origen was much in demand as a preacher.
     d.  Origen was a early (foremost) Christian Theologian, a celebrated Christian writer, teacher
          and Theologian of antiquity.8  
     e.  However, Origen was a Platonist. He believed that Jesus was "subordinate to the father in
          power and dignity."9  He taught that Jesus was created, not eternal.10  Origen believed that
          if Satan fell by will, even he can repent. Encyclopedia Britannica, "Origen"   
      f.  Influenced by a semi-Gnostic writing, Origen believed that Hell cannot be an absolute
          since God cannot abandon any creature.  
     g.  After his death, opposition steadily mounted, respectful in the Greek Christian
          Methodius of Olympus' criticism of his spiritualizing doctrine of the Resurrection
     h.  A wealthy Christian named Ambrose, whom Origen converted from the teachings of the
          heretical Valentinus and to whom he (Origen) dedicated many of his works, provided him
          with shorthand writers. 

          This resulted in a "stream of treatises and commentaries
      that began to pour from Origen's pen."11 and altered
      manuscripts in accordance with his belief's.

6.  The Church was declining fast. (30-100 AD.)The ministries of the apostle and prophet
     was gone. (130 AD.) The laying on of hands had become a ritual.(150 AD.) The Baptism of
     the Holy Ghost and the Gifts of the Spirit gone. (160 AD.) The plurality of eldership in the local
     Church replaced with monarchal bishops. No leading of the Spirit, therefore man began to
     lead. By this time many churches were looking to Rome for direction. By (185 AD.) infant
     baptism replaced Water Baptism by immersion. By 200 AD. a gap began to form between
     doctrine and experience. This was the time of Origen and Clement, Arius (Arianism) The
     denial of The Deity of Christ, and His bodily resurrection. 
 
     This was the time of the altering of God's Holy Word!

7.  By 325 AD. This corruption was so "notoriously corrupt" that Constantine13 who was
     by that time, ruler of the Roman Empire and the Church14) called for the Council of Nicaea.
     (325 AD.) and those corrupt  manuscripts were thrown out!15 Then Arius, the Christian priest
     of Alexandria, Egypt, whose teachings (Arianism) gave rise to this corruption was denounced 
     by the early church as a heretic.16   
               
     Note: One of the chief accusations against Origen's teaching was making the Son inferior to
     the Father and thus being a precursor of Arianism (Arius)

     It should be noted that Constantine rejected Arius (Arian) and his doctrine under pressure
     of the Nicaean Council.17 Constantine was not a born again believer, he "chose Christianity
     as the best of possible religions". Constantine was the "wolf of paganism openly assumed 
     the sheep's clothing of the Christian religion."18   The Emperor Constantine II, Constantine's
     son supported Arianism, as did Valens, one of his successors.
  
8.  Constantine's solution was make fifty (50) official Bibles for the Church, and eliminate
     the "notoriously" corrupt manuscripts.19 The individual that Constantine selected to bring
     uniformity of the manuscripts was Eusebius. (Remember there was the "canon" of scripture,
     but not a printed Bible as we have today)
     a.  Eusebius was a Christian theologian, most learned man of his age
     b.  Eusebius wrote the most ancient history of the Christian Church
     c.  Eusebius was called the father of Church History
     d.  Eusebius was a chief figure at the  Council of Nicaea and stood with Constantine because
          Eusebius was classified as in Arian.20
    
9.  Eusebius selected manuscripts from Origen's 5th.column as text for the 50 Bibles
     Eusebius selected manuscripts using Origen's 5th.column out of Origen's "Hexapala," 
     because he was a great admirer of Origen and a student of his philosopy. (Arianism)
     Eusebius also used alternative readings from the other columns in the Hexapala, and
     material from the Apocryphal tradition. Also used the lengendary Hegesippus.21